top of page
Desktop Selebz Logo.webp

Ethical Impact of Influencer Marketing: A Case Study on Lily Singh's Alcohol Brand Endorsement during Diwali

  • Jan 9, 2024
  • 3 min read

In the ever-evolving landscape of advertising, reaching Generation Z poses challenges, with traditional mediums losing appeal. Social media influencers, especially mega influencers like Lilly Singh, play a significant role in promoting products. This study delves into the ethical persuasion employed by Lilly Singh, a comedian and mega influencer, endorsing alcohol brands, focusing on a Diwali advertisement.


THE TARES TEST

The TARES Test, developed by communication scholars Jean Kilbourne and James Bovée, serves as an ethical framework for evaluating persuasive messages, particularly in advertising. The acronym TARES represents Truthfulness, Authenticity, Respect, Equity, and Social Responsibility. Each element reflects a key aspect of ethical persuasion. Truthfulness assesses the honesty and accuracy of the message, ensuring it doesn't deceive or mislead. Authenticity examines whether the communicator genuinely supports the message being conveyed. Respect gauges whether the persuasive appeal aligns with societal norms and values. Equity questions the fairness of the persuasive attempt, addressing issues of manipulation and balance. Lastly, Social Responsibility considers the broader impact on society, evaluating whether the persuasive message contributes positively or negatively to cultural values and norms. The TARES Test provides a structured approach for scrutinizing persuasive communication, aiding in the assessment of ethicality in various contexts, including the realm of influencer marketing on social 



Truthfulness:

Respondents express skepticism about influencers, emphasizing that credibility is often compromised. Despite trust issues, participants acknowledge Lilly Singh's sincerity in conveying the alcohol brand's message during Diwali. Humor content, a hallmark of Singh's style, contributes positively to the perceived honesty of the ad.


Authenticity:

Ambivalence exists among respondents regarding the authenticity of Singh's endorsement, especially considering the cultural context of Diwali. While some feel she genuinely supports the product, others find a disjoint between festival celebration and alcohol consumption.


Respect:

The humorous approach is deemed persuasive by participants, but many find the content misleading and challenging societal norms around alcohol. The promotion of alcohol during a traditional festival like Diwali is criticized, revealing a clash of cultural ideologies.




Equity:

Awareness of the influencer's role in promoting the product is universal among respondents.

Despite understanding it as a paid promotion, participants claim they are not influenced to try the product. Mixed responses on feeling duped; some believe Singh is conveying a culture of fun, while others feel manipulated.


Social Responsibility:

Participants express concerns about westernization influencing Indian society through such advertisements. While gender equality is appreciated, the promotion of alcohol is seen as conflicting with traditional values, especially in conservative South India. Uncertainty exists about whether Singh's influence contributes to societal betterment.



Research Methodology and Objectives

The study employed qualitative methods, including content analysis of Singh's Diwali post and in-depth interviews with 20 Generation Z participants. The objectives include analyzing ethical persuasion, understanding Generation Z perspectives, and examining how alcohol ads by influencers are perceived.


The study reveals a nuanced perspective on influencer marketing, emphasizing the need for ethical considerations in brand endorsements, especially for products like alcohol. Despite being from an educated and open-minded generation, Generation Z participants expressed reservations about the cultural appropriateness and authenticity of Singh's endorsement. This prompts a broader conversation about the role of influencers in shaping societal values and the responsibility they bear in endorsing certain products.

In conclusion, THE TARES TEST emerges as an indispensable tool for scrutinizing the ethical integrity of influencer marketing. It is a call to action, urging audiences to question not just the products they endorse but the very essence and integrity of influencers who claim to be the authentic voice of a generation. As we navigate this complex landscape, it's time to demand transparency, honesty, and a reevaluation of the role influencers play in shaping our culture.



 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page